8
Let us specify immediately, for more clarity: does without any reference to the author
almost totally, does without reference to the author apparently, as we will see further
on.
On several occasions the Ecrits
denounce the "resistance" the analyst betrays via the psychobiographical reference
to the writer. While subscribing to this suspicion, one can extend it to a certain
formalist neutralization of the effects of the signature. Which supposes the opening
of another (theoretical and more than theoretical) space for the elaboration of these
questions. The very opening in which we are engaged here.
|
|
|